David Martinka
2018-07-24 14:58:39 UTC
Hi,
   I'm not sure where this should be reported, but I've tested the
stable v1.0-1-g6b9e934 version, which supports a few new chips, and I
can successfully PROBE, READ, and WRITE with the following chips:
MX25U12835F
W25Q128.W
   This is on two different Gigabyte AB350N Gaming WiFi motherboards,
flashrom compiled and running as so:
|$ ./flashrom -R||
||flashrom v1.0-1-g6b9e934 on Linux 4.8.17-tinycore64 (x86_64)||
||flashrom is free software, get the source code at https://flashrom.org|
   I have not had occasion to test ERASE on either, so I cannot comment.
   What is the proper place to report this information?
   I'm not sure where this should be reported, but I've tested the
stable v1.0-1-g6b9e934 version, which supports a few new chips, and I
can successfully PROBE, READ, and WRITE with the following chips:
MX25U12835F
W25Q128.W
   This is on two different Gigabyte AB350N Gaming WiFi motherboards,
flashrom compiled and running as so:
|$ ./flashrom -R||
||flashrom v1.0-1-g6b9e934 on Linux 4.8.17-tinycore64 (x86_64)||
||flashrom is free software, get the source code at https://flashrom.org|
   I have not had occasion to test ERASE on either, so I cannot comment.
   What is the proper place to report this information?
--
David Martinka
Engineering & Support
MediaVue Systems
+1 781.926.0676
mediavuesystems.com <http://www.mediavuesystems.com/>
Your Vision Enabled
David Martinka
Engineering & Support
MediaVue Systems
+1 781.926.0676
mediavuesystems.com <http://www.mediavuesystems.com/>
Your Vision Enabled